336X280 TENGAH ARTIKEL
KARTU KREDIT, KARTU KREDIT CIMB, KARTU KREDIT MEGA, TIRTO.ID, asuransi mobil murah, harga mobil terbaru, kecantikan wanita, hosting, kartu kredit bca, kartu kredit mandiri, kartu kredit BNI, forex, SAHAM, FBS,
www.baynews9.com/content/news/baynews9/news/article.html/content/news/articles/bn9/2013/5/15/citrus_county_mother.html
They include a picture of the mother, her name, what she is in jail charged with and that her newborn was taken into protective custody by FL DCF. The only part of the case details they did not include was the name of the "family members" with whom the infant has been placed.
Are there confidentiality laws protecting anyone in the case or not?
WAIT - here's another one:
www.claytodayonline.com/ee/claytoday/en/component/fullstory/20130516_020_art_5/teen-held-on-sex-charge
Also Florida. A local doctor made a report to DCF and the police. It was the doctor, "whose name was not released under Florida’s confidentiality laws"!
As to the teen who is the alleged perpetrator, his name, the town he lives in, his picture and the offense he is being charged with were all reported.
Why are reporters, especially mandated reporters, having their identities protected? Where is the protection for the accused? For the children involved in the cases?
0 Response to "Protected by confidentiality laws. Really?"
Posting Komentar